(Click
on under
lined link to go to
subject)
- Contents
Chapter
1. Vision System Design
Chapter
2.
Biological
Eye Designs
A. Camera
B. Pinhole
C. Concave
mirror
D.
Apposition
E. Neural
superposition
F.
Refraction
superposition
G.
Reflection
superposition
H.
Parabolic
superposition
I. Multiple
sensor
types and
combinations of types
Chapter
3. Eye
Design Illustrations
Chapter
4. Eye
Reproduction
Chapter
5. Optical
Systems Design
Chapter
6. The Eye Designer
Related Links
Appendix A -
Slide Show & Conference Speech by Curt Deckert
Appendix B -
Conference Speech by Curt Deckert
Appendix C -
Comments From Our Readers
Appendix D -
Panicked Evolutionists: The Stephen Meyer Controversy
|
EYE DESIGN
BOOK
Chapter 2
Sections A, B and C
- Prev Page
Go to Chapter Links -
Next Page -
(Click on PICTURE IN TEXT
to bring up LARGE PICTURE)
2. BIOLOGICAL EYE DESIGN
Biological eye designs
are classified into a number of broad categories. Some primitive eyes,
plant eyes and eyes of some creatures do not have image-forming optical
designs. These can be noted as multiple sensor types, but there are also
creatures with a mix of image forming and non-image forming sensors. There
are considerable optical variations within each of the eye design type.
For example, we find variations in the use of simple or highly corrected
compound lenses, sensor combinations, focusing, light control, color pigments
in cells, resolution over field of view, maximum resolution, eye-supporting
and pointing structures, and in other features. This section is divided
into nine broad image-forming optical design types as follows:
A. Camera
B. Pinhole
C. Concave mirror
D. Apposition compound
E. Apposition-Neural superposition compound
F. Refracting superposition compound
G. Reflecting superposition compound
H. Parabolic superposition compound
I. Multiple sensor types and combinations
of types
A
. Camera
Camera-type eye
designs form an image on a retina (instead of film) from eye lenses. They
are found in animals of all complexities and sizes such as humans, vertebrate
animals, some aquatic creatures, spiders, and other creatures. In general,
slightly different designs are required for small aquatic creatures such
as jellyfish.
Figure 2.1 illustrates typical
optical designs for a camera-type eye, where it forms an inverted image
on the retina. (p.300, Fig. 2, Vision Optics & Evolution by
Dan E. Nilsson, Biosciences, Vol. 39, No. 5, May 1989)
The following variations in Camera Eye structure
illustrates applications for particular animals requiring different optical
designs for their vision systems. All are based on the same design themes.
Figure 2.1a Camera Eye Structure Durations
(Reference: Figure 5.7, p. 83, Animal Eyes, Michael F. Land, Dan-Eric Nilsson,
Oxford Animal Biology series, Oxford University Press, 2002- Please see their book for
more details )
There are many different approaches taken to
focus camera type eyes. The following figure illustrates some of the extent
of different focusing mechanisms.Figure 2.1b Camera Eye Focus
(Reference: Figure 5.9, p. 85, Animal Eyes, Michael F. Land, Dan-Eric Nilsson,
Oxford Animal Biology series, Oxford University Press, 2002- Please see
their book for more details )
Good focus is
not possible in all creatures having camera-type eyes. This is especially
true in small eyes with a fixed focal distance between lens and retina,
such as those in some fish and other aquatic animals. Precision focusing
results from interactive controls between the eye and brain. This function
is much like auto-focus lenses on man-made cameras. Some camera-type eyes
focus by changing the shape of the lens instead of moving the lens relative
to the retina. In an eye this takes place by muscles
|
Figure 2.1. Camera Type
Optical Design variations
Fig 2.1a. Camera Eye
Structure Durations
Fig 2.1b. Camera
Eye Focus
|
changing the effective curvature of the lens
from a shorter focal length to a longer focal length.
Some camera eye focusing
takes place using hydraulic methods. Here, fluid is moved in and out of
chambers to adjust a fixed focal length lens relative to the retina to
achieve focus. In addition, amphibious animals using this technique often
need to provide radical water pressure accommodations using hydraulic
controls.
Lens materials, photoreceptors' or light sensors' resolution, shape, size
controls, color vision, and field coverage can be slightly different for
eyes of different creatures. Large creatures typically have large visual
fields with good resolution. The camera type eyes of birds, may have very
close photoreceptor cell spacing for high resolution to see small targets
at long distances. An example of an actual camera eye is shown in Figure
2.2. (Fig 2.2a by Bruce Chambers) (Fig 2.2b adapted from 1999 Eye Poster
from Anatomical Chart Co. Skokie, IL) |
Figure 2.2a. Example
of Camera Eye
Figure 2.2b. Human
Camera Eye (Like Fig 3.44a)
|
The density of photoreceptors
at a specific point determines the resolution available at that point in
the total field. In some variations of less-precise camera type eyes, the
lens is so close to the retina that a clear image cannot be focused at
very close or very far object distances. Some aquatic camera eyes use gradient
index material to help correct the lens design. Gradient index surfaces
are even difficult for man to define and to reproduce under ideal conditions,
yet many cells, with very slight variations, grow into these unique patterns.
Some animals use eye
scanning to achieve a larger effective field of vision with a smaller number
of sensors. Typically, eye-pointing controls in the brain move the eye's
center of vision to the area of interest. Normally, eye resolution is far
less at the edges of the field of view than near the center where most
detail is seen. This is typical of camera lens systems design, especially
in wide field applications, where it is difficult to achieve high resolution
over a large angular field of view. The placement and integration of each
eye sensor indicates intelligent optical design.
| Human eye photo- receptors consist
of rods and cones. Rods operate in dim light and cones are responsible
for visual acuity and color perception. Small animals with just a few photo-
receptor cells in small retina fields have very limited resolution. Figure
2.3 contains a cross section of the human retina to illustrate
the design complexity of the layered sensor arrangement. (P. 31, The
Computational Eye, Frank Werblin, Adam Jacobs, Jeff Teeters, IEEE
SPECTRUM, May 1996) |
Figure 2.3 Cross Section of Human
Retina
|
| There are
many different configurations of rods and cones in camera-type eyes. Rods
and cones are shown by Figure 2.4. (P. 548, Fig. 7, Science & Technology
Encyclopedia, McGraw Hill) |
Figure 2.4. Rod and Cone Details
|
In some creatures, rods
will have different color pigments to see efficiently in specific color
environments. Others are packaged more densely for higher resolution and
have less emphasis on detecting many different colors. Some retinas require
light to pass through multiple retina layers more than once instead of
just falling onto a single absorbing surface. Most biological eyes have
wide-angle vision; however, some have wide-angle scanning capability where
the moving eye provides only narrow angle vision at each image.
B. Pinhole
The pinhole eye
design occurs in the eyes of the nautilus, the eyes of a planarian (flat
worm) and the eyes of other simple animal forms. This is a less complex
optical design
that does not require a lens. Light
is not focused with a lens like the camera eye. An example of this optical
design is the pinhole box camera that came out during the 1930's and 1940's.
This camera worked, without any lenses, by using natural optical light
diffraction to form an image. Those cameras were easily improved upon with
simple lenses. Figure 2.5 illustrates the pinhole optical design. As one
of the less complex optical designs it may be the most likely to occur
naturally without much intelligent optical design. This, of course, assumes
the existence of the right mix and configuration of cells to make up this
type of eye.
(p.300, Fig. 2, Vision Optics & Evolution
by Dan E. Nilsson, Biosciences, Vol. 39, No. 5, May 1989)
|
Fig 2.5 Pinhole Optical Design
(Like Fig. 6-2)
|
The pinhole eye retina
is relatively simple and similar to the camera eye retina. It does not
have a lens (or much of a lens) so it does not provide fine optical corrections
like the
|
camera eye, the resultant image is less clear. Variable pupils are used to adapt
to a variety of lighting situations. It takes more light to detect a given
scene because a bright image on the retina from a pinhole eye requires
a large pupil (small f/no.) while a sharp image focus on the retina requires
a small pupil (large f/no.). Therefore it is difficult to obtain sharp
faint images using a pinhole optical design. |
Fig 2.6. Pinhole Eye of Nautilus
|
Insects with compound eyes,
such as flies, do not have a retina that can pre-process data, like creatures
with pinhole or camera optics. For most insects, the total eye volume required
for a scaled-down pinhole design would be much larger for a given angular
field than more complex multifaceted eyes taking into account the expected
light gathering power and resolution of each facet.
Insects achieve a greater
field of vision in small packages than they would using the pinhole approach.
An example of a pinhole eye is shown in Figure 2.6. (P. 281, Readers Digest,
Exploring
the Secrets of Nature, 1994)
C.
Concave mirror
The concave mirror design
is found in a few small eyes. For example, when a clam opens its protective
shell it exposes multiple eyes with a small concave mirror design. Each
small concave mirror eye forms an inverted image on small retinas like
the design shown in Figure 2.7. (p. 299, Fig. 1, Vision Optics &
Evolution by Dan E. Nilsson, Biosciences, Vol. 39, No. 5, May 1989)
The large arrow represents the object the eye
is looking at and the small arrow represents the image of the large arrow
on the retina.
Concave mirror eyes
are more complex than pinhole eyes, since they use internal concave mirrors
to form images.
Reflective mirrors are
used as a substitute for lenses to form images on retinas. Potentially,
they can have more total image resolution in a small space |
Figure 2.7 Concave
Mirror Optical Design.
|
than pinhole eyes, because they provide better-corrected optics in a
small space. Typically, images are focused on transparent retinas, made
up of arrays of transparent eye sensors.
| This type of eye is
like a reflective telescope design using one concave mirror instead of
a camera lens. These are not as well-known eye designs as camera type eyes.
It is difficult to achieve a wide field of view with high resolution using
this type of design. Adapting this design of an eye from another type would
be difficult. An example of the concave mirror type of eye is shown in
Figure 2.8. (P. 322, Readers Digest, Exploring the Secrets of Nature,
1994) |
Figure 2.8 Example of Concave
Mirror Design in Scallop Eyes
|
|
|