(Click on underlined
link to go to subject)
- Contents
Chapter 1.
Vision
System Design
Chapter
2. Biological Eye
Designs
Chapter
3. Eye
Design
Illustrations
Chapter 4.
Eye
Reproduction
A.
General
requirements
1.
Optical,
computing and intelligence requirements
2.
Design
for eproduction
3.
Physical
development
requirements
B.
Optical
design and
integration
1.
Optical
design issues
2.
Programming
issues relative to probability
3.
Original
intelligence issues
C.
Design
control
1.
Control
of cell complexity
2. The
DNA
plan for control of cell integration
D. Questions
and comments on evolution related to eye reproduction
Chapter
5. Optical
Systems
Design
Chapter
6. The Eye Designer
Related
Links
Appendix
A - Slide Show & Conference Speech by Curt Deckert
Appendix
B - Conference Speech by Curt Deckert
Appendix
C - Comments From Our Readers
Appendix
D - Panicked Evolutionists: The Stephen Meyer Controversy
|
EYE DESIGN BOOK
Chapter
4
Section A
-
Prev Page
Go
to Chapter
Links
-
Next Page
-
(Click on PICTURE
IN TEXT
to bring up LARGE PICTURE)
4. EYE
REPRODUCTION A.
General requirements
We will deal with
the reproduction of optical designs, biological reproduction of
computing requirements, overall vision system design and development,
and the integration of the biological eye reproduction process. Here I
take a practical engineering approach, instead of a traditional
biological approach based on unsupported hypotheses about origins.
Design depends on very exact quantitative and qualitative cause and
effect relationships.
By
"reproduction"
we are referring to
the process of duplicating identical types of eyes fromone generation
to another of a plant, animal or human.
Our Creator has designed "very high technology" into all kinds of
organisms. This may cause an illusion of macro-evolution, since
populations of specific organisms adapt genetically to a wide variety
of environments. Cause and effect provide one potential starting point
in considering consistent eye reproduction.
What is the limit of capability of any creature, except man, to improve
its vision?
What if you had the assignment of providing vision to some
creature?
Would you talk to an biological eye expert at a local
university?
Professors of biology may not
know what it takes to build or reproduce a vision system, but most
optical designers can recognize good vision system design. We would not
expect most academic biological scientists to have optical engineering
design and development experience. It takes intelligence,
inventiveness, and continuous experimentation to develop and perfect
new optical technologies. This assumption may be missing, as scientists
speculate on how nature creates the irreducibly complex building block
cells of eyes. Contrast simplified diagrams of biological and optical
designers. (Figs 4.1 and 4.2a from pg. 3 and 32, Neuro-Vision
Systems, Ed. by Madan M. Gupta,
George K. Knopf, IEEE Press, 1994) (Figs 4.2b-c by permission
of James T Fulton, Dir of Research Vision
Concepts) |
Figure
4.1 Biological
Vision Design
Diagram
Figure
4.2c Human
Visual system
including
some brain detail
|
Figure
4.2b Circuit diagram of visual system
|
Figure
4.2a Possible Optical Vision Design Alternatives for a Neural System
|
1. Optical, computing,
and intelligence
requirements
Most insects, animals and
humans have at least two eyes for binocular vision. Both eyes require
coordinated optical and image processing systems which have to be
reproduced in very fine detail to provide good vision generation after
generation. Brain cell intelligence provides coordination between eyes
during reproduction, vision operation and then provides a repair
process.
Many people may be able to put
basic elements together to create a vision system. However, creating or
developing it to function in the right order for reproduction of all
the building blocks is a far greater challenge. Originally an
intelligent plan was required to craft the DNA,
to provide the plan to generate and arrange cells in the correct order.
The DNA
design also has to deal with the overall control to provide multiple
chemical processors to coordinate the growth of each cell. Eye cell
systems would never reproduce in a repeatable way without specific
detailed plans for control of the process. There must be complete
directions for eye reproduction at the DNA detail level to reproduce
the next generation of eyes.
If a designer is not present,
"creative mutations" have to create vision reproduction technology.
Fundamental biological eye optical designs must include the capacity to
reproduce. This process must control variables and tolerances to
compensate for cell variance during the total development process, so
each eye type has the necessary functional characteristics. For this to
happen there must be very detailed plans at the cellular level to
control the manufacturing of the correct materials for the variety of
eye building block cells. Their order of cell placement in the eye is
very important. The following figure illustrates how cell placement
must occur for vision to take place. (Pg. 4,
Neuro-Vision Systems, Ed. by
Madan M. Gupta, George K. Knopf, IEEE Press, 1994) |
Figure
4.3 Cell Architecture
for vision
system
development. Like
Fig. 5-22
|
Scientists are just beginning
to realize the extent of information needed to configure cell
arrangements. For example, an optical design plan has to take into
account materials, geometry, field of vision, light availability, size
resolution, etc. Even the functions of focus and light control will not
allow useful vision without intelligent programming added to basic eye
design and construction. Evidence of design shows that programming was
designed in by wisdom, knowledge, and power, not by small random
mutations and environmental selection. Focus and control of the eye
requires a brain with enough intelligence to recognize good images to
control the process of focus correction and light control.
Even sight restored after
being born blind requires intelligence, programming and learning. This
can be more difficult to integrate than if vision occurred in a normal
sequence of events. This illustrates the need for intelligent input
2. Design for
reproduction
One should not equate the
highly controlled fetal tissue development during the growth of the eye
in the human embryo with any sort of evolution or random function.
The& reproduction of eyes is very much an irreducibly complex
technology. The evolutionary process assumes no outside intelligence is
added, but reproduction results from an intelligent plan.
What creature is
able to develop a
system of reproduction?
Fetal tissue is controlled by
internally contained DNA codes at the cell level. This code, located in
cells, can contain approximately the same amount of information found
in a large encyclopedia. Please see the following illustration to get
some perspective on the structural size of DNA. One must realize that
DNA is well within the central part of each cell. (Pg. 5,
Neuro-Vision Systems, Ed. by
Madan M. Gupta, George K. Knopf, IEEE Press, 1994) |
Figure
4.4 Structural size of cells
|
It is exceedingly difficult to
estimate the intelligence necessary to design and develop a means of
eye reproduction in terms of present optical knowledge. It is
paradoxical that even in simple animals we see amazingly complex
optical designs. Because of the vast diversity of animals, it is
especially unlikely that any completely new self-generated eyes have
occurred without specific intelligence built into the brains and cells
from the start. Communication or information cannot produce anything
without intelligence.
3. Physical development
requirements
There also has to be power to
do the work of chemical processing for reproduction, even if the DNA
information is there. It takes a coordination of many
complex-engineering design functions to provide sight, as we know it.
At the present time, the process of completely understanding all
details of the initial reproduction process design and development of
reproducible eyes is beyond human capability.
Consistency in materials for
basic building block cells, even with different food or fuel inputs, is
required of all eye types. Eye materials have to be consistent, even
though there may be significant input or food differences. The design
or shape of materialsused
in eyes must not change because of what we eat or drink. Multiple
chemical processing plants reproduce new cells. Cells provide
communication of intelligence to help heal and repair cells and to
provide growth, as needed, according to an overall plan. Each cell is a
factory system, like organs are systems of systems. Eyes are complex
body systems that have complex systems of systems.
The overall operating
complexity of the eye is beyond present technology, but reproduction of
eyes is even more astounding.
This is especially true for our eyes where thousands of cells have to
be
assembled to very close tolerances just to provide seemingly minor lens
subsystems.
See the following vision
system diagram of
various functions needed for vision. (Pg. 373,
Neuro-Vision Systems,
Ed. by Madan M. Gupta, George K. Knopf, IEEE Press, 1994) |
Figure
4.5b Functions Needed for Vision
to Take Place
(Starting with light at the
visual sensor and
ending with recognition)
|
The complexity of eye optical
reproduction indicates
an original designer-creator at the micro level because of the
complexity
of cells, arrangement of cells, intelligence in cells, communication
between
cells for growth, control of the optical properties in cells, and
communication
between light-sensing cells and the brain. There is an astounding
orchestration
of technologies during eye reproduction in the development from an egg
to an adult. The number of parallel brain interactions within eyes
provides
a major scientific challenge in the study of eyes. It would be
interesting
to see what happens when Michael J. Behe (author of Darwin's
Black Box)
and other molecular biology scientists or biochemists study eye
reproduction
molecular biology in more detail.
Reproduction must have an
originating designer
because of the communication of design details, which must occur in the
process of vision reproduction. This is a very complex technology in
the
case of eye operation in a variety of environments such as temperature,
pressure, available food, available light, wavelengths of light, etc.
To
leave good engineering design changes to random mutations could be
destructive
to the development and reproduction of eyes because of the close
tolerance
optical requirements of overall eye design. Original intelligent design
suggests a means of orchestrating the technologies associated with
complex
eye formation and reproduction. The probability of this happening
without
intelligent design is so remote that probabilities approach one part in
a number with at least 20 zeros. This calculated by taking the
probability
of each type of building blocks occurring and then the probability of
one
cell going to the correct cell to form a vision system. In any case,
the
probabilities are extremely low for vision systems occurring without
intelligent
designs.
Questions
for Discussion
How would you evolve
a vision
system?
How does one explain
the
near perfection of a process that has produced consistent reproduction
of eyes at rapid rates for millennia of time? |
|